Age Doesn’t Matter in Mobile Banking, Study Finds

December 19, 2012
By

shutterstock_119059435A recent study of 2.5 million online banking customers by Intuit Financial Services found that older customers behave no differently than younger customers in the mobile banking environment.

Another important conclusion from the study was that mobile customers save — and earn — banks money.

It’s well known that younger customers, particularly Gen Y customers, are the fastest adopters of mobile banking technology, and Intuit’s study supports that conclusion.

“For younger customers,” says Russell Lester, director of analytics for Intuit Financial Services, “technology is front and center. There is no need for financial institutions to reach out to them with new services.”

Instead, younger customers seek out financial institutions that offer the services they want.

With boomers and seniors, it’s a different story. Take a service such as mobile remote deposit capture (RDC). With older consumers, particularly seniors, awareness  –- as in, “How do I get this service and how does it work?” — and security are the most important impediments to adoption. Lester told Bank Innovation that financial institutions need to adjust their marketing to appeal to an older demographic by addressing these concerns.

However, once they become active mobile users, older customers log into their accounts as often and spend as much time using mobile banking as younger customers.

“Touches are driven by paying bills and PFM, checking financial health,” he said, “so the needs of young and old customers is not different in terms of touches.”

But do older customers want to bank on their smartphones and tablets?

“The value proposition of mobile RDC, for example, is the same for older and younger customers,” Lester said. “Speed and convenience.”

Another conclusion of the Intuit study is that more touches and longer touches are good things for banks. Lester puts it plainly: “The more customers engage in the digital banking channel, the more profitable they are.”

About 40% of active online banking customers also use the mobile channel, according to Intuit.

The Intuit study shows that increased time spent in digital banking channels translates directly to higher retention rates and higher account ownership of multiple financial products, both wins for financial institutions. “Time spent on the site tends to correlate with investment in the brand.”

(Here at Bank Innovation, we have long argued and blogged about this ROI of innovation channels.)

Lester said that users spent 38 minutes on average on their bank’s website, more than twice the amount of time spent on, for example, LinkedIn.

“That’s a lot of mindshare,” Lester said.

A commonly cited challenge for mobile is its purported inability to facilitate the cross selling of financial products. But Lester doesn’t see it that way. “When a user adopts a new service, such as mobile RDC, that is a cross-sell,” he said.

Why is using a free service, such as mobile RDC, considered cross-selling? Because use of mobile products leads to savings for banks.

“The cost of a mobile RDC transaction is 10% of a conventional check deposit at a branch, $0.40 versus $4.00,” Lester said. “Digital banking has matured to the point where it can handle most transactions end-to-end, and the branch is more specialized, for items like mortgages.”

There are profound implications for bank marketers.

“Our study helps our customers prioritize where they invest,” he said. “What will their focus be? Who do they want to attract? The same benefits of early adopters are true for older customers, so marketing efforts should diversify — promotions should be geared toward older generations.”

Share It:

Tags: , , , , , , ,

2 Responses to Age Doesn’t Matter in Mobile Banking, Study Finds

  1. Elizabeth on December 20, 2012 at 3:51 pm

    I definitely agree with the shift in marketing for different generations around mobile adoption. However, I don’t agree with the comment about not needing to reach out to younger generations regarding new banking services. As a thirty-something in the financial services technology industry, I am probably a lot more tech savvy and familiar with mobile banking capabilities than some people my age. I had to tell my husband about our bank’s new RDC feature. I understood what P2P payments were, and the value of the service, whereas that payment capability may not be “top of mind” for other mobile banking users my age.

    I think a shift in messaging to address multiple demographics must be a focus for banks. Banking is often a very dry topic for younger generations and there is a lot banks can do to be more engaged with their customers and mobile banking users to enable cross-sell or up-sell opportunities. With the older crowd, the topics of security and ease-of-use are definitely things that banks need to prove. Whereas, I’d be a lot more interested in PFM with a tool through my bank to help me better understand my spending and saving habits to help be become a more valuable banking customer to them…except I haven’t had the time to explore it myself – whereas if my bank had proactively reached out with a PFM tool and tutorial or incentive for using it I would probably have adopted it by now.

  2. Alex Johnson on January 16, 2013 at 10:10 am

    Great post! This idea of the cross sell between the various forms of contact is very interesting. While not being the traditional idea of cross selling, I think it brings up a great point on the importance of a true multichannel approach. Having more channel options for consumers’ various interactions not only offers them more convenience, it can also drive greater profitability for the bank through reduced costs. Win-win.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




Archives